Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This guy said it better than me but mine was shorter I guess:I hope they like being raped by immigrants.
This guy said it better than me but mine was shorter I guess:
Biden's sock-puppeteering team will direct him to up the deportations until the first microsecond that it is no longer politically detrimental, at which point all directives to deport will once again be ****-canned, and we will return to a de facto open borders policy.lol
Biden is now deporting more people than Trump
Both President Joe Biden and former President Donald Trump have pledged to return more migrants to their home countries, with differing approaches as immigration has emerged as a top issue in the coming U.S. election rematch.www.reuters.com
I think it was more about the fact that the GOP had staked out a position and everyone on the left had to be against it no matter how little sense it made for them. If you are in the "big tent" for the democrats you have to support the whole big tent, even if many of the positions in that big tent are anathema to your typical beliefs. It is why black leaders in the Dem party have made pro-LGBTxxxx statements. Most don't really support it, but it is the price you pay to be in the big tent.
Yep. They've done this by labelling anyone who disagrees with their agenda as not just incorrect but evil. If you oppose DEI, you're a racist. If you don't want to import terrorists and terror-supporting individuals, you're an Islamophobe. If you don't want drag queens hanging around little kids, you're a homophobe. If you don't want dudes showering with your teenaged daughter, you're a transphobe. If you don't like abortion, you hate women.
Of course, this can be a powerful weapon against your opposition if it's reinforced by the media (which it is), because it effectively keeps you from having to defend your position on the merits. How often do Democrats have to explain why it's good for drag queens to be around children or why abortion is a good thing? Never. Same goes for political parties in the UK and France when it comes to importing hordes of Islamic conquerors.
However, the downside is that it repels people who agree with most but not literally all of your agenda. They don't want to be called evil by their own party, so they don't join. If they have too much skin in the game not to join, then they give in to their party's mob and flip-flop. Consider Joe Biden or Jesse Jackson. In the '80s, they were pro-life and never would have gone along with the LGBTQ agenda. Now they're totally cool with both. Does anyone believe they have really had a change of heart? Of course not. They weren't teen-agers in the '80s. They were grown-*** men in their 40s who had well-considered beliefs that were very unlikely to change with age. Hell, they're probably grossed out by both. But they know that standing by their principles would cost them everything they have, so they sell out and go along with what they know to be wrong.
Republicans should just call them names back like murderers, pedophiles, thieves, and demons.
Republicans should just call them names back like murderers, pedophiles, thieves, and demons.
Not only would they not reinforce, they would go on the attack, defining such a R as racist, xyz-phobic, or whatever.Far less productive if the media doesn't reinforce the narrative for you.
Far less productive if the media doesn't reinforce the narrative for you.
Still. Fight fire with fire. Don't need to be afraid of the dying news media establishment. They too are all those horrible things.
This assumes that fighting the same way Democrats do can't backfire.
Republicans are always afraid of what might happen if they actually fight the Democrats. It's the story of the 20th century and it has destroyed the country.
And I will say this though, the Dreamers deserve some help but they are being held hostage by the Left, not by the Right, and I say this meaning the Left has no interest in curtailing illegal entry.
Two big issues with the Dreamers. First, they won't get any help unless it's part of a broader border security and immigration control effort that doesn't include a broader amnesty. It has to be geared toward something that overall reduces immigration - including legal immigration.
Second, there needs to be tight definitions on what is and more importantly what isn't a Dreamer and how one proves himself or herself up be a Dreamer. To me, a Dreamer is someone who came as a young child with his parents and is now an adult. A Dreamer is educated in American schools and speaks English fluently. And I would want to see certified school records to prove this. Affidavits or even live testimony from individuals isn't going to cut it.
Satisfy all that, and I think help for Dreamers becomes a real possibility.
Absolutely. But you know they would probably view the certification as a barrier as they had nothing but the clothes on their back when they crossed. At least, that will be the message. I don't know how someone in that position (legitimately) could ever prove it.
The single biggest reason deportations and the wall won't happen is money. both of those actions will require massive amounts of money. E-Verify would require a tiny fraction of the money, and would lead to illegal immigrants self-deporting once there are substantially fewer jobs available. I don't mind deportation being a portion of the puzzle just to show employers and illegal immigrants we really mean it this time. But to think we are going to deport 20+ million illegal immigrants, or even 2Mil, is pie-in-the-sky thinking.
Of course we need e-verify, but at this point the Dems don't care about illegal aliens getting jobs. They just want their bodies in the US long enough to fill out paper work. With e-verify in action, Dems would provide even more handouts to illegals so they wouldn't have to work.The single biggest reason deportations and the wall won't happen is money. both of those actions will require massive amounts of money. E-Verify would require a tiny fraction of the money, and would lead to illegal immigrants self-deporting once there are substantially fewer jobs available. I don't mind deportation being a portion of the puzzle just to show employers and illegal immigrants we really mean it this time. But to think we are going to deport 20+ million illegal immigrants, or even 2Mil, is pie-in-the-sky thinking.
Long overdue!Cut headcount of the federal bureaucracy.
I heard he was a fascist dictator?If DJT wins, he will only be POTUS for 4 years.
It may just be selective hearing but it feels like I'm starting to see/hear a lot more noise about the declining population as a pro-immigration argument. These reports come out every now and then but it feels like they are using this as a talking point a bit more.
This is not a good reason to allow immigration. They always cite "expanding the economy" but that is a lame argument for the average citizen. Most of our societal problems owe at least part of their genesis to an influx of low skill, low asset, ESL people. Housing shortage, school crowding, school underperformance, crime, budget issues...are all at least in part due to immigration.
Rank your win/loss confidence predictions for the season.
Season ConfidenceHelp us count down to game day with your favorite player pics.
100 Day Countdown 2024