Starting off.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Racer What was the situation with Soares from Iowa State last year? I understood she “just” missed a Red Shirt year?? Does that have any precedent in this case?Questions:
1. Rori played in 12 games. The rule is 30% or 8 games whichever is more and you're allowed to redshirt. 12/38 games = 31%. Will NCAA grant the waiver?
2. A lot made out of "Coach Rori". How will that realistically translate onto the court?
3. Will they be making a out of season trip this year to play exhibitions and just give the players a bonus trip for fun? I know that when Karen was still coaching there was a plan 2-3 years down the road to maybe take a "road trip" to Australia to play exhibition games (also, I think this was Karen's plan to scout potential Aussie players for the future)
4. IF the NCAA don't grant that RS, then next year will be Rori's last year? Does that help with Chavez?
Looking them up, Soares played 13 out of 32 total games. So that's 40%. Easy rejection, but ISU was not happy with the answer.Racer What was the situation with Soares from Iowa State last year? I understood she “just” missed a Red Shirt year?? Does that have any precedent in this case?
If the bath water is still warm it's worth more than if it's cold...I have always thought that redshirt rule stinks across the board for ALL athletes. IMO the percentage should be significantly increased. Why do they take away a season from a kid due to a season-ending injury when the athlete didn't even get to play half of it? Honestly, I think it ought to be 2/3 because that's the only thing that comes close to constituting almost a full season. At the very least it ought to be 1/2. But that's my opinion and it's worth about as much as used bath water. LOL
Or a stretch 4? I was extolling the virtues of Maddie's flexibility yesterday. It sure gives Vic a piece to use as a matchup nightmare for most opponents - find the glaring mismatch and use Maddie there, while using our other roster pieces to fill in where Maddie isn't. I am assuming the freshmen can come in and play valuable minutes at the 2,3, and 4 spots themselves, spelling DeYona, AMo, and Holle. Add Jak and Amina to the mix (assuming they both stay), and we have a lot of chess pieces for Vic to use.is she a two or a three plus back-up one?
I loved that adjustment against the zone.I can’t remember who was on the floor when Schaefer put Booker at the short corner against the zone. Without a lot of review work, typically that player is the four….perhaps not a true definition of stretch four. Too technical for me, but certainly she is a match-up nightmare at the four.
I use that term because Maddie's range, mobility, and quickness exceed that of players traditionally thought of as a 4.perhaps not a true definition of stretch four.
So much to learn about teams not named South Carolina, Tennessee or LSU
We'd need a transfer or one of the two freshmen to take that spot. Shae Holle would be a very valuable backup on the wing to provide a defensive spark.I don't see it. Even with a Rori, Texas doesn't have the overall guard play to compete with South Carolina. Shay Holle as your starting 2 guard isn't going to cut it.
Nope, Shae won't ever be relegated to mop-up duty... she's way too valuable for that. But you need three-level threats on the perimeter so that means being able to create your own shot when necessary. I think we'll have a good mix of skills on the perimeter and minutes will be shared accordingly. I can tell you that, barring injury, all three of those freshmen are going to see significant minutes.Lee appears as candidate for starting two guard…..later in the year. Holle isn’t gonna go from a 40 minute player to mop-up. Holle will start and depending on Lee’s game, Lee might get 15 -20 minutes a night. The obvious clue is in scouting reports, where the experts talk about her good mid-range game AND need to develop her three point shot. It appears Lee might have a well rounded game……with need for future development of outside shooting. Remember that Holle was NOT a good outside shooter first couple years but now is. In my fair and biased opinion, Holle and Lee are the two guards. Harmon and Booker and Preston the point guards and Booker is the point forward at the three and sliding to the point at times. The award that Booker got is for small forward which is the 3.
A healthy Rori and Booker are great pieces, I'm just not sold on Shae Holle being a starting 2 guard in the SEC. I also view Lee as a wing and not a guard IMO.Rori, Shay/Lee and Maddie are a pretty good back court, IMO.
I think Shay and Jordan are likely to be the first 2 options at SG with Gisella and Jak behind them for those minutes. I can’t agree that Jak is being chased by Justice though. Jak usually came in for a SG, sometimes the 3, to guard on the perimeter. Justice is a 4 or a 3 in a big lineup, you probably don’t want out defending at the 3-pt line.I’m such a bad analyst of players. I lose faith in new players when they struggle early, then dismiss em. Enter Maul and Jack. Certainly Maul struggled last year. Jack did as well and wished she had struggled less since she was a sophomore. Now the newest is being slotted in ahead of them by me. Maul has to improve her handle and get quicker(knee) to stay ahead of Preston. Jack is the one at risk to losing minutes to Carlton unless she steps up her decision making. Several players could move up or down the pecking order depending on their commitment to improving in the offseason.
It sounds like you are trying to tell us how good Lee is. Hope you're right.Funny... some people on this board were questioning how good Booker was until they got to witness it for themselves (even though others in this board were trying to tell them).
Some freshmen step in ready to go, some don't. We'll see.
Rank your win/loss confidence predictions for the season.
Season ConfidenceHelp us count down to game day with your favorite player pics.
100 Day Countdown 2024